Skip to main content

Facebook's Instant Articles : Am I right to be concerned?

If I were the publisher of a newspaper, I'd be thrilled by Facebook's new partnership with newspapers.  And I'd be scared to death of it too.


In May, Facebook and nine media outlets, The New York Times among them, announced a partnership, Instant Articles,  where Facebook would publish the paper's content in Facebook's news feed.  Ads served with the stories sold by the papers will generate revenue for the papers they do not have to share with Facebook.  Revenue for ads sold by Facebook will be shared with the papers, with the newspapers getting 70%.


Eventually, more newspapers will be included.  Maybe even your local paper.


I'm barely in the news business.  I majored in Journalism back in the mid-70's, irritated by many of my other J-School compatriots who were drawn in my Woodward and Bernstein.  My own interest pre-dated Watergate.


After graduating I soon found myself involved with personal computers, and rarely regretted not getting into the news business, but have always followed it closely.  In fact, an early media post on this blog brought me to the attention of the local paper, and lead to my now almost five year old Family Tech column.


Facebook will bring a vast audience to the news.  People spend a lot of time on Facebook, and the news will flow to them naturally as part of the news feed in their Facebook experience.  Otherwise they have to specifically go to a newspaper's (or other news outlet) site to read the news.  People go to Facebook more often.


Facebook also knows a great deal about us.  It's algorithm knows our interests and can be used to better target us with pertinent ads, and even news stories we'd find interesting.


And to repeat, the news outlets still receive the revenue from their own ads, and most of the revenue of ads sold by Facebook to go with their content.


The papers will benefit from this greatly.


But...


But, the papers will benefit from this greatly.  Soon, it is possible most of their eyeballs will come from Facebook.


But, the papers will benefit more than Facebook.  For Facebook, it is just one more piece of content.  Content that came after they already had one and a half billion users.


For newspapers, it may become where most people see their content.


And that gives Facebook a lot of power.


Power to lower the percentage of revenue shared with news outlets when Facebook sells an ad to go with the content.  Power even to demand a cut of the revenue for ads the paper sells themselves.


I haven’t seen anything about Facebook giving the papers the data they have on users, or the data they will collect about what people are reading.  Even if they are offering the data initially, they could cut it off down the road.


What you see on Facebook’s news feed is determined by their own algorithm.  And how it weighs the posts you see is a mystery to all but Facebook, although they recently tried to give us a bit more control.  Will a news outlets stories be seen by all?  What if Facebook knows you have no interest in financial news, will it not show you information you need to know about your job, and your retirement income?  Facebook is not a news organization.  They want to show you what you are interested in, not what you need to know to be an informed individual.


So what happens if a news outlet decides Facebook is no longer a hospitable place for their content?  Will readers follow them back to their own websites, or just idly wonder why they are no longer on Facebook, as they continue to get news from outlets still on Facebook?


Publishers may find they have to go to Facebook if all their competition does, and find it hard to ever leave, no matter how bleak it could get there for them with so much out of the publisher’s control.


Jeff Jarvis, a professor and director of the Tow-Knight Center for Entrepreneurial Journalism at the City University of New York’s Graduate School of Journalism, has argued on the TWIT Network’sThis Week in Google” podcast that these issues can be dealt with through negotiations now between the news outlets and Facebook.  Contracts though are not forever, and I wonder what the balance of power will be a few years down the road when they have to be renegotiated.d

Update: I've been sent this article that also came out today from MIT Technology Review.

Update 7/21: Medium published an alternative view.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Recording your own notes with Google Voice

Note :   April 2016:  Frankly I don't know if this works anymore.  It is 7 years old.

I stopped using this when Google Now became useful on my phone, and I could dictate reminders using it.



I found a way a while ago to use Google Voice to record a personal note, transcribe it, and email it to me. A recent Lifehacker post "Five Things We'd Like to See in Google Voice" lists that need as their #5 request, so I realized what I'd figured out is not common knowledge.

In GV's Contacts, create a Group "Special Transcription"

To avoid listening to my standard voice mail when I call, I recorded a short voice mail greeting for this group simply saying "Record note now"

I added a contact with my own cell phone number as the only number, and made it the sole member of this group.

In GV's phone settings, I edited the settings for my cell phone. In the section "Direct access to voicemail when calling your Google number from this phone?" I se…

Planning for a post Evernote era - Part 1

The Evernote world is aflutter this week after Tech Crunch said that following the departure of several key high level people, Evernote might be in a "death spiral".

While I hope that does not happen, even if they do survive, we should all plan for their demise.  No app and no company is forever.  Indeed, for every piece of software we use, we should ask ourselves, "Is any of the data managed by this program something I would need if this program no longer was being updated?"  And in the case of software like Evernote, if its back end servers were turned off forever.

If the data is required, we need to figure out how to get the data out of the program, and readable without the program. One should actually ask and answer the question before they begin using a new piece of software and loading our precious data into it.

I'll be writing more about this topic and Evernote. For now, know that even if Evernote shut off its servers tomorrow, your data remains in your…

Google could let any developer make the next Evernote

After trying loads of Task apps over the years, I have settled for now on a combination of Taskary and Google Tasks.  What they have in common is they both use Google Tasks to save the tasks.

If a new task app catches my eye tomorrow, it likely will not receive room on my phone or desktop unless it too uses Google Tasks to store its tasks.  That way I do not need to re-enter my tasks for the new app.

This is possible because Google has an API for Google Tasks.  An API or Application Programming Interface lets an app send tasks to Google, and get tasks from them.

Google has a huge collection of APIs into their services.  I just wish they had one more.

I wish for an API for a note taking application.  They may or may not let it be part of Google Keep.  Even if they did not have an app themselves using the API, it would be nice to have an API any programmer could use to develop their own image of what a note taking app looks like.

The data would count against your Google storage. With th…