Skip to main content

The Evernote Kerfuffle Continues

Evernote's recent price increase, and the more controversial restriction of Free Basic users to just two devices, has caused an uproar online.

Evernote's Forum thread on this topic has already reached 93 pages.

Most free dissatisfied Free users are taking great umbrage, feeling betrayed by a company they have yet to pay a dime to.

And some paying customers have legitimate concerns over a pretty big increase for Premium Level from $50 to $70 annually.

Many have been casting about for alternatives, and many of pledged to take their ball, er notes, and  leave for greener pastures. They usually mean Microsoft's OneNote.

The free users objection to a two device limit apparently is many use Evernote on their home PC, their phone and their office PC.

They have not been assuaged by the fact the rather robust Evernote Web Client does not count against the two client limit.

And the limit is not truly two devices, but two simultaneously logged in clients.  A free Basic user could log out Evernote from their Home PC, and login at their work PC when they get in.

If they forget to do that, they could log off their phone client while using the Evernote client at work.  Sure, it is a bit of a pain, but a free Basic plan of any service has to offer both value to get you to use the service, and Evernote does that in spades, and yet have some desirable features available only to paying customers. A little friction is a motivator. When I was on Basic service I often bumped up against the 60 megabyte monthly upload limit.  That motivated me to move up to a paid tier.  The client limit is meant to do the same.

Most of the people threatening to flee Evernote plan on going to Microsoft's Onenote.  You would think Lisa Schmeiser, Editor in Chief of Supersite for Windows, a site covering almost exclusively Microsoft, would be all for that.  Yet today, she published a great read entitled "Why I'm Not Ditching Evernote Just Yet".

His view parallels some thinking I have had recently.  Migrating to OneNote, learning to use OneNote, adjusting to the features you will leave behind, understanding perhaps any new features you gain, will all take time.

Do you pay to have your lawn mowed or the oil changed in  your car?  You could do all those things yourself, but it is worth paying someone to save you a bit of time.

Paying a little to keep what you like about Evernote is worthwhile in my opinion.

Maybe it is not to you.  So be it.  Move on.

Schmeiser summarized:
Evernote saves me time. And right now, I'm okay with paying $70 a year for a product with a proven record as a useful tool. If Evernote ceases to be useful to me, I'll reassess. But for now, the $20 price hike is a lower cost than the time I'd sink into learning how to re-do everything. There's a reason for the saying "time is money." I want one. I'm willing to spend the other. 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Recording your own notes with Google Voice

Note :   April 2016:  Frankly I don't know if this works anymore.  It is 7 years old.

I stopped using this when Google Now became useful on my phone, and I could dictate reminders using it.



I found a way a while ago to use Google Voice to record a personal note, transcribe it, and email it to me. A recent Lifehacker post "Five Things We'd Like to See in Google Voice" lists that need as their #5 request, so I realized what I'd figured out is not common knowledge.

In GV's Contacts, create a Group "Special Transcription"

To avoid listening to my standard voice mail when I call, I recorded a short voice mail greeting for this group simply saying "Record note now"

I added a contact with my own cell phone number as the only number, and made it the sole member of this group.

In GV's phone settings, I edited the settings for my cell phone. In the section "Direct access to voicemail when calling your Google number from this phone?" I se…

Google could let any developer make the next Evernote

After trying loads of Task apps over the years, I have settled for now on a combination of Taskary and Google Tasks.  What they have in common is they both use Google Tasks to save the tasks.

If a new task app catches my eye tomorrow, it likely will not receive room on my phone or desktop unless it too uses Google Tasks to store its tasks.  That way I do not need to re-enter my tasks for the new app.

This is possible because Google has an API for Google Tasks.  An API or Application Programming Interface lets an app send tasks to Google, and get tasks from them.

Google has a huge collection of APIs into their services.  I just wish they had one more.

I wish for an API for a note taking application.  They may or may not let it be part of Google Keep.  Even if they did not have an app themselves using the API, it would be nice to have an API any programmer could use to develop their own image of what a note taking app looks like.

The data would count against your Google storage. With th…

Planning for a post Evernote era - Part 1

The Evernote world is aflutter this week after Tech Crunch said that following the departure of several key high level people, Evernote might be in a "death spiral".

While I hope that does not happen, even if they do survive, we should all plan for their demise.  No app and no company is forever.  Indeed, for every piece of software we use, we should ask ourselves, "Is any of the data managed by this program something I would need if this program no longer was being updated?"  And in the case of software like Evernote, if its back end servers were turned off forever.

If the data is required, we need to figure out how to get the data out of the program, and readable without the program. One should actually ask and answer the question before they begin using a new piece of software and loading our precious data into it.

I'll be writing more about this topic and Evernote. For now, know that even if Evernote shut off its servers tomorrow, your data remains in your…